{"id":1152,"date":"2011-03-10T05:34:01","date_gmt":"2011-03-10T12:34:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/?p=1152"},"modified":"2011-03-10T05:34:01","modified_gmt":"2011-03-10T12:34:01","slug":"review-battle-los-angeles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/?p=1152","title":{"rendered":"Review: BATTLE: LOS ANGELES"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/3-10-11-Battle-LA.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/3-10-11-Battle-LA-202x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"3-10-11 Battle LA\" width=\"202\" height=\"300\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-1153\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/3-10-11-Battle-LA-202x300.jpg 202w, https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/3-10-11-Battle-LA-203x300.jpg 203w, https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/3-10-11-Battle-LA-400x593.jpg 400w, https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/3-10-11-Battle-LA-456x675.jpg 456w, https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/3-10-11-Battle-LA.jpg 486w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 202px) 100vw, 202px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/nofixbutton2.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/nofixbutton2.gif\" alt=\"\" title=\"nofixbutton\" width=\"100\" height=\"112\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-1154\" \/><\/a>The Geneva Convention doesn\u2019t apply to aliens from outer space.  <\/p>\n<p>Consider the moral efficacy of a critical scene from \u201cBattle: Los Angeles.\u201d  During a firefight, a small group of US Marines capture an injured alien soldier and with the help of a veterinarian crudely probe the creature with a large knife.  As Staff Sgt. Michael Nantz (Aaron Eckhart) rips and tears apart the injured soldier from beyond, it writhes in pain and oozes some kind of fluid.  Finally, the Sgt. discovers a kill shot location.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of attempting to communicate with the beast or take him into custody for interrogation, our soldiers are shown torturing and killing it.  I\u2019m not sure how to feel about that.  But one thing\u2019s for sure, it is a perfect example of what \u201cBattle: Los Angeles\u201d is\u2014a big budgeted action sci-fi flick that shuns intelligence for corny melodrama and thrills.  And to be honest, the movie accomplishes its broad goal capably.  Don\u2019t expect anything approaching the sophistication that netted \u201cDistrict 9\u201d an Oscar nomination or the fun that made \u201cIndependence Day\u201d a huge box office draw. <\/p>\n<p>The story told in \u201cBattle: Los Angeles\u201d is summed up in its 3 minute trailer.  And the depth of the narrative is no deeper than that puddle.  One day a meteor shower rains down on the coast lines of the world.  But instead of these meteors crashing at a high speed, they slow down as they enter our atmosphere.  This is concerning so the military mobilizes.  Shortly after touchdown, an alien invasion commences.  We\u2019re told that this tactic is a textbook colonization.  However, I can\u2019t imagine that an alien species that is capable of intergalactic travel would just send in the ground troops.  There is some convoluted nonsense about the aliens setting up communication control stations, but not enough is revealed for us to give any of it much credibility.<\/p>\n<p>We learn through newscasts that the aliens are after our water.  But they choose to invade our land.  Surprisingly, the oceans of the world begin to recede.  My first thought is that since our planet is 70 percent water, and that\u2019s what the aliens want, why care about the land?  Wouldn\u2019t it make more sense to touchdown somewhere out in the ocean and fuel up on that water first?  No matter, \u201cBattle: Los Angeles\u201d is told exclusively from the perspective of a small group of Marines who enter the fray of battle in the title city.  And as far as a corny war movie, it works efficiently.  <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Dark Knight\u2019s\u201d Aaron Eckhart maintains a stern upper lip and has to spout a number of cheesy lines without any of the humor that worked so well coming out of Will Smith\u2019s mouth in the similar and superior \u201cIndependence Day.\u201d  And that\u2019s the problem the \u201cBattle,\u201d it\u2019s a movie that wants to take from \u201cIndependence Day\u201d and \u201cDistrict 9\u201d and draw in both audiences.  While it is an admirable goal, unfortunately, I can\u2019t recommend it to either of those viewing demographics.  \u201cDistrict 9\u201d fans will find \u201cBattle\u201d dim-witted, and \u201cIndependence\u201d fans will find it corny and lacking in fun.<\/p>\n<p>But does \u201cBattle\u201d work as a sci-fi action flick?  The gritty visual scope is taken right from the much smaller budgeted \u201cDistrict 9.\u201d  In a few short hours of battle, the city of LA looks like Baghdad.  And much of the action is captured using handheld close-ups that, at times, are a little nauseating.  The lightly bleached color pallete wants to convey authenticity and the enormous sets (many likely computer generated composites) are very good.  The $100 million budget is in full force, but think about how much more they were able to achieve with the $30 million spent on \u201cDistrict 9?\u201d  Or even how decent things looked on the $10 million \u201cSkyline?\u201d  Or think about the reported $500 thousand expended on last year\u2019s romantic \u201cMonsters?\u201d  If only the story of \u201cBattle: Los Angeles\u201d had lived up to its visuals.<\/p>\n<p>But I can\u2019t shake the feeling I had while watching Aaron Eckhart playing a good-guy battle weary Marine crudely dissecting that alien grunt.  \u201cBattle: Los Angeles\u201d looks good but the story lacks soul.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Exciting Visuals Can\u2019t Shake Dim-witted Story<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1153,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reviews","has-thumb"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1152"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1152\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1155,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1152\/revisions\/1155"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1153"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}