{"id":1630,"date":"2011-07-21T21:32:23","date_gmt":"2011-07-22T04:32:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/?p=1630"},"modified":"2011-07-21T21:32:23","modified_gmt":"2011-07-22T04:32:23","slug":"review-captain-america-the-first-avenger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/?p=1630","title":{"rendered":"Review: CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE FIRST AVENGER"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a>\u201cCaptain America: The First Avenger\u201d is the kind of awkward failure that was hinted at by \u201cThor\u201d and nearly spelled disaster with the DC comic adaptation \u201cGreen Lantern.\u201d While not a terrible film, \u201cCaptain America\u201d lacks edge necessary to excite viewers.<\/p>\n

The classic comic book hero, Captain America (or \u201cCap\u201d as he is often called), started back in 1941 even before Pearl Harbor. Billed as a patriotic superhero, the character was a reaction to the events in Europe during World War II. After a popular run in which the book sold as many as one-million copies per month and was revived the first time during the immediate post-WWII era, Captain America was eventually brought back by Stan Lee in the 1960s in an issue of the Marvel comic \u201cThe Avengers.\u201d <\/p>\n

Cap\u2019s origin story in the comics is far more interesting than the one presented in this big budget movie. Steve Rogers (Chris Evans), a sensitive art student and a 90-pound weakling, desperately wants to join the military in hopes of fighting Hitler. Conceived in the months prior to Pearl Harbor, Rogers becomes Captain America and later goes on to combat the NAZIs primarily in the form of the evil twisted scientist Johann Schmidt later dubbed The Red Skull.<\/p>\n

The movie\u2019s take on Rogers\u2019 story fails to spend enough time telling us who he is. Played by the beefy Chris Evans, the filmmakers do make a smart decision to have Evans play Rogers both before and after his amazing transformation into Captain America. Through the use of seamless computer animation, Evans is shortened and slimmed down from hunk to 90-pound weakling. The effect is striking.<\/p>\n

The first third of the film shows great promise. Although I would have liked to have learned more about who Rogers is, what happened to his parents (the brief explanation isn\u2019t enough), and it would have been interesting to see a little more of his artistic side. When the story moves from character development to actioner it loses focus and credibility. Little effort is made to tighten the villain, The Red Skull (a menacing Hugo Weaving), and make him anything more than just a one-note baddie. Missing is any appreciation of Skull\u2019s motivations and inner torment. He\u2019s just a vicious megalomaniac with unique facial deformities. Telling his origin story with a little more definition may have made us care and even fear the guy. Compare Sebastian Shaw in this summer\u2019s \u201cX Men: First Class.\u201d Not only was Kevin Bacon perfect for the role, but the script kept us guessing as to what he would do next. By contrast, The Red Skull seems a bit more dim-witted.<\/p>\n

\u201cCaptain America: The First Avenger\u201d is a bigger film than it should have been. While the period setting is the epic WWII environment, the fictitious events depicted involve one rogue NAZI hell-bent on world domination. The movie clearly wants to set-up the bigger \u201cAvengers\u201d film that is coming next year. And to that end, the technology employed by The Red Skull is subtly credited to the realm belonging to Thor. But since that link is kept so cloaked some viewers will find unbelievable Skull\u2019s various machinations and hoards of faceless, futuristic, ray gun wielding henchman. Early in the movie, the Skull acquires a mystic power source and later uses it to run his industries and weaponry. But the time compression of the script makes the development of Skull\u2019s operations way too fast. He has not one but many enormous plants armed with guns and tanks that would rival anything created today. It is all a little too much. By the time the action packed conclusion comes round, the story has gone so far off the rails that viewers might have a hard time engaging. <\/p>\n

And sadly, the action sequences aren\u2019t really of note, especially given all the other movies that have done this sort of thing before. It is almost as if the script runs out of ideas and fills in the gaps with one battle after the next trading intelligence and strategy for full-frontal attacks. This is where sophisticated audiences will check out and even groan a bit. The Red Skull\u2019s weapons are so powerful that anything else looks like a child\u2019s toy. And yet, over and over again, he\u2019s thwarted by what appears to be a small group of machine gun totting GIs. Had Skull had a little more control of his own apparatuses, the whole film would have had a harder more credible edge. Instead director Joe Johnston, who made the better and more focused \u201cThe Rocketeer,\u201d seems intent on impressing us with larger and larger sets and populating the screen with armies foreign to any known battlefield let alone the product of the WWII period.<\/p>\n

\u201cCaptain America: The First Avenger\u201d is presented in the ubiquitous 3D format and that aspect of the film is worth talking about. Cap is armed with an indestructible shield and when he throws it at his opponents, it flies out into the audience. While this effect is solid and the images in the film are much brighter than other 3D offerings of late, it fails to save this weak Marvel comic book entry.<\/p>\n

Warts and all, there is an audience for \u201cCaptain America.\u201d Aside from die-hard comic fans, youngers will probably dig this adventure. And where something like \u201cThe Dark Knight\u201d would be inappropriate viewing for younger viewers, \u201cCaptain America\u201d like \u201cThor\u201d and the DC movie \u201cGreen Lantern\u201d is harmless enough and probably a little more wholesome than it should be. That lack of edge is where this thread of Marvel adaptations seems to be going and doesn\u2019t bode well for the \u201cAvengers\u201d being released in 2012.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jonathan considers what should have been…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1630","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reviews","no-thumb"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1630","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1630"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1630\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1634,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1630\/revisions\/1634"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyfilmfix.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}